A couple weeks ago I
published the newsletter
article,
How the Landlady Lost
the Deposit.
I was surprised to find
an email from another
landlady here in town,
Joan which took me to
task for this article
she took to be
pro-tenant.
Here is what Joan said
about my article:
PLEASE LET ME HAVE YOUR
LAST NAME SO I WON'T
RENT TO YOU.......I SEE
THE POINT BUT AT TIMES
WE HAVE TO CHARGE
TENANTS FOR ITEMS THEY
DAMAGE.......IN YOUR
CASE IT SOUNDS LIKE SHE
HAD A NON REFUNDABLE
CLEANING DEPOSIT, WHICH
I DO NOT HAVE, BUT WHEW,
THIS WAS NOT A FUN
"GAME". IN CASE YOU
DON'T SEE THIS, BY
PUBLISHING THIS
INFORMATION FOR THE
"WORLD" TO READ YOU JUST
INFORMED ALL THOSE NUTS
OUT THERE WHO ARE JUST
WAITING TO SUE. THIS
HURTS THE HONEST
LANDLORDS JUST GETTING
BY AND PROTECTING THEIR
PROPERTY. SOME
DEDUCTIONS ARE OFTEN
NECESSARY......AND I
ALWAYS TRY TO BE FAIR
ABOUT THEM......BUT YOU
JUST ALERTED ALL THOSE
IDIOTS WE DON'T WANT TO
TANGLE WITH. TRY
TO BE HELPFUL TO "WE"
PROPERTY OWNERS......IT
WILL HELP YOUR
BUSINESS......
The caps were all Joan,
sorry, I know it is hard
to read….Here was my
reply:
Hmmm...do you believe
that you get to break
the law with impunity?
You are not allowed to
have mandatory cleaning
fees you take from
security deposits.
This was not a fair
person, this was someone
who broke the law...
It is not helpful to
help people break the
law; they are helped by
following the law.
I am afraid Joan was
only more angry in her
reply:
RECEIVED YOUR
REPLY.......I GUESS YOU
WERE NOT REFERRING TO ME
ABOUT MANDATORY CLEANING
FEES....SINCE I DO NOT
CHARGE EITHER A CLEANING
FEE OR A CREDIT CHECK
FEE OR APPLICATION
FEE. YOU SEEM A BIT
DEFENSIVE HERE. WHAT I
AM POINTING OUT IS THAT
YOU ARE BITING THE HANDS
THAT WILL FEED YOU.
NO ONE IS SUGGESTING
LANDLORDS CHARGE UNFAIR
FEES OR PRACTICE
UNFAIRLY BUT YOU ARE
VERY NAIVE IN THAT ONCE
YOU HAVE HAD A VERY,
VERY UGLY TENANT WHO
DOES NOT PAY RENT AND
DESTROYS YOUR PROPERTY
IN REVENGE, THEN YOU
WILL BE ABLE TO VIEW
BOTH SIDES.
MY POINT IN WRITING IS
THAT YOU, DEAR FELLOW,
JUST BLASTED OUT TO ALL
THE CREEPS WHO ARE
TRYING TO SUE LANDLORDS
AND WHO MAKE THAT THEIR
ONLY AGENDA...... I
HAVE HAD ONLY ONE BAD
APPLE AND THEY COST ME A
MINT....JUST DECIDED NOT
TO PAY THEIR RENT....AND
WHEN THE PAPERS CAME
THEY STARTED THEIR
DESTRUCTION.......MY
POINT IS YOU ARE
ENCOURAGING LAWSUITS
FROM THE NON-LEGITIMATE
TYPE TENANTS......WE
KNOW SOME LANDLORDS CAN
BE UNFAIR AND YOU HAD A
BAD EXPERIENCE.....BUT
AIRING IT ON YOUR
WEBSITE IS A VERY BAD
PRACTICE FOR SOMEONE
TRYING TO BUILD A
BUSINESS.
WE ALL NEED ..A FAIR
BUSINESSMAN INTERESTED
IN THOSE OF US
STRUGGLING TO MAKE ENDS
MEET.....VERY HIGH
PROPERTY TAXES AND
UTILITY COSTS OUT OF
SIGHT..........MY BOTTOM
LINE IS ONE NEEDING A
FRIEND ON MY
SIDE......WHERE IS YOUR
PRIORITY AS A BUSINESS
PERSON? HAVE A NICE
DAY.....AND I WISH YOU
GOOD LUCK.
The thing Joan misses is
renting properties is a
business. Several years
ago I worked with a
Court Officer serving
process in Mecosta
County. He contracted
with a property
management company that
rents mainly to Ferris
State University
students.
Now don’t get caught up
on the student part of
this, look at the
process and think what
message your tenants
would get when you do
not take all lawful
actions to protect your
interests.
In Big Rapids. the day the
rent was late, the late
fees were applied and
the 7 Day Notice to Quit
was posted.
On the day the
Notice to Quit expired
the lawsuit to evict for
non-payment of rent was
filed and I would pick
up the lawsuits to be
served once a week and
serve the suits.
There were almost no
evictions. The property
manager was predictable,
consistent and
unwavering. To drop the
suit the tenant had to
pay the court costs, the
late fees and the cost
to serve process. In the
first months of the
school year this
actually was
another source of
revenue for the property
manager and the kids
learned quick.
Getting back to Joan, we
see this visceral
reaction to an article
she believes benefits
the tenant predator.
Joan could not be more
wrong, yet fails to
reach out to learn more,
instead she reaches out
to berate someone who is
really informing.
Education is now a bad
thing?
The predator tenant Joan
talks about cannot
succeed in an
environment where
landlords are doing
business as allowed by
law. Here in West
Michigan we have a
terrific organization in
the
Rental Property Owner’s
Association.
The cost to join is $185
a year plus a $50
application fee in the
first year. RPOA gives
you access to credit
reporting which includes
all the local courts, as
well as seminars and
support in your rental
property business.
Yes I know, it costs
money, but I said this
is a business, though,
right? How much does it
cost you to get rid of a
bad tenant?
By the time you
get rid of them you may
have lost two month’s
rent. Once they are gone
there are repairs and
your rental still sits
empty. If the rent is
just $500 a month you
have already paid $1000
. Instead of paying a
yearly fee to the
Rental Property Owner’s
Association
, we have the
landlords who could pay
5 years of dues instead
of subsidizing the
predator tenant.
When I see the anger
Joan let loose in my
direction I wonder if
she is not one of the
many
landlords who want to be
loved and are always disappointed
the “breaks”
they gave tenants did
not pay off. Landlording is not a
popularity contest, it
is a business.
Joan’s
mistake is she chooses
not to learn from her
mistakes and take the
actions required to
protect her investment.
Rental Property Owner’s
Association
is not the solution
and there are other
resources including
lawyers who specialize
in landlord/tenant
relationhsips.